while i have found many sunnyvale and santa clara cops to be grossly negligent, discriminatory, unwilling to protect and serve as mandated - and conspiratorial as well, there are a few good cops out there...and while the ratio of roughly 2 out of 10 should apply to bad cops vs good cops, instead it is quite the opposite; i have found that out of approximately 10 cops; only 1 or 2 are actually good cops willing to protect and serve...
the good cops i encountered on the sunnyvale police force are: 1) officer discher - who once thanked me for all the help i provide to the local community; and 2) officer cortez - who was the only officer on the scene who seemed willing to arrest crazy tom after his violent attack, but got talked out of it by his seemingly crooked fellow officer in command; 3) in santa clara, police officer leipelt - who instinctively knew something was wrong when my door got kicked in by RRJ-3 (license # 2RLN869) and showed genuine concern about it - and while he ultimately did not arrest RRJ-3 (even though i had photographic evidence of a previous questionable encounter with him, and a witness close by and willing to talk) he still seemed like a straight arrow with a good attitude - an overwhelmed straight arrow - but still a straight arrow; 4) officer leipelt's fellow SC police officer on the scene (who i did not catch the name of - he was a tall white guy with anderson cooper-like speckled greying hair) instinctively knew something was wrong as well, and seemed willing to take action, if it were not for officer leipelt's evidence-related reservations...i could tell he was a good person and a good cop as well, he seemed truly concerned about the actions of RRJ-3, and i really appreciate that; and finally - 5) i did not catch his name, but the officer who gave me a ride down to the police station after my bogus arrest last summer (and also took photos of my bloody bodily injuries created by officer lopez and officer nazi) was a true human being and a good soul...i think he knew my civil rights had been agregiously violated and that officer lopez had discriminated against me in the process, and i want to thank him for being such a good cop...
but! let's improve those good cop/bad cop ratios, please - my goal is to get the crooked cops fired and/or retrained, and the good cops promoted - also! if the police can use flimsy 30 year old evidence of a fingerprint and/or a cigarette butt to solve crimes against the police - why is my evidence not valid as well? exhibit A / exhibit B / exhibit C / exhibit D (etc) or this? mister-o's hat on my property after his murderous attack? - why is this not evidence?...do i need to be dead for it to be valid evidence?...or does somebody down at the police department want me dead?...also; why is that guy who attacked the nobel prize winner being held in jail while my VARIOUS attackers run free?...and after my brother died i did what i see as being equally important research worthy of a nobel prize as well @ http://likroper.com/onlygoodv8n1.htm (scroll down to the PERHAPS section) you know; just because government physicists are sitting on information that should be made public to end the military-industrial complexes' violent terrorist folly once and literally FOR ALL does not make my research any less valid...and just because i am an outspoken activist who spoke vapid dissent at a city council meeting a few months before the attacks, and one who likes to commune with the natural world that our evil government so loves to illegally pave over (and also one who dropped out of high school just like albert einstein) does not mean i deserve any less protection than any other person - no no no...you know; i even see drunken, drug-addled homeless people being protected now - so why am i being discriminated against in such a way?...OBJECTION!...what the fuck is the matter with you people!?...
the good cops i encountered on the sunnyvale police force are: 1) officer discher - who once thanked me for all the help i provide to the local community; and 2) officer cortez - who was the only officer on the scene who seemed willing to arrest crazy tom after his violent attack, but got talked out of it by his seemingly crooked fellow officer in command; 3) in santa clara, police officer leipelt - who instinctively knew something was wrong when my door got kicked in by RRJ-3 (license # 2RLN869) and showed genuine concern about it - and while he ultimately did not arrest RRJ-3 (even though i had photographic evidence of a previous questionable encounter with him, and a witness close by and willing to talk) he still seemed like a straight arrow with a good attitude - an overwhelmed straight arrow - but still a straight arrow; 4) officer leipelt's fellow SC police officer on the scene (who i did not catch the name of - he was a tall white guy with anderson cooper-like speckled greying hair) instinctively knew something was wrong as well, and seemed willing to take action, if it were not for officer leipelt's evidence-related reservations...i could tell he was a good person and a good cop as well, he seemed truly concerned about the actions of RRJ-3, and i really appreciate that; and finally - 5) i did not catch his name, but the officer who gave me a ride down to the police station after my bogus arrest last summer (and also took photos of my bloody bodily injuries created by officer lopez and officer nazi) was a true human being and a good soul...i think he knew my civil rights had been agregiously violated and that officer lopez had discriminated against me in the process, and i want to thank him for being such a good cop...
but! let's improve those good cop/bad cop ratios, please - my goal is to get the crooked cops fired and/or retrained, and the good cops promoted - also! if the police can use flimsy 30 year old evidence of a fingerprint and/or a cigarette butt to solve crimes against the police - why is my evidence not valid as well? exhibit A / exhibit B / exhibit C / exhibit D (etc) or this? mister-o's hat on my property after his murderous attack? - why is this not evidence?...do i need to be dead for it to be valid evidence?...or does somebody down at the police department want me dead?...also; why is that guy who attacked the nobel prize winner being held in jail while my VARIOUS attackers run free?...and after my brother died i did what i see as being equally important research worthy of a nobel prize as well @ http://likroper.com/onlygoodv8n1.htm (scroll down to the PERHAPS section) you know; just because government physicists are sitting on information that should be made public to end the military-industrial complexes' violent terrorist folly once and literally FOR ALL does not make my research any less valid...and just because i am an outspoken activist who spoke vapid dissent at a city council meeting a few months before the attacks, and one who likes to commune with the natural world that our evil government so loves to illegally pave over (and also one who dropped out of high school just like albert einstein) does not mean i deserve any less protection than any other person - no no no...you know; i even see drunken, drug-addled homeless people being protected now - so why am i being discriminated against in such a way?...OBJECTION!...what the fuck is the matter with you people!?...
